![]() But, then again, if you're anything like us, you've probably spent most of your time getting to grips with AutoCAD's capabilities rather than its history. In this guide, we'll examine AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT-looking at the differences in functionality, capability and much more.Īs one of the front-running products in the CAD industry, you're already familiar with Autodesk's flagship product, AutoCAD. Autodesk created a 'lite' version in AutoCAD LT to broaden its customer base further. Offering solutions to various industries-from architecture to engineering to entertainment-there's no way to avoid it. None have surpassed the popularity and power of Autodesk's flagship product, AutoCAD. A key player in the evolution of CAD, Autodesk has since released a range of top software packages. Since AutoCAD's inception in 1982, Autodesk has been a significant and resounding presence in the CAD industry. This week, we're turning our heads to look at CAD giant Autodesk and its most popular products. For this reason, we set out to create comparison guides for the top CAD programs on the market. With conflicting information-or none at all-there's no natural way of finding out each program's capabilities. Not sure how well it works out of the box (we shrunk/modified a lot of the parts libraries).Logicle IT knows how difficult it can be for CAD enthusiasts and professionals to determine the differences between CAD packages. For me, the system had already been setup by someone knowledgeable - not sure if I would have time/inclination to set it up myself. The bad news: my opinion is that it looks tricky to setup. builds on your ACAD knowledge (competing products require you to learn how to draw again) We are able to export the BOM to our MRP system. catalog parts are picked from a database (so you always describe the same way and don t make typo's on part numbers) ![]() automatic cross referencing and sheet-to-sheet signal linking ![]() You can quickly hop around sheets that belong together. sheets in a project are grouped via the WDP project file. I think I timed myself on one project (maybe 30-40 sheets) and I think I took 3 days to fully renumber, retag, and cross reference. I used to use vanilla Autocad, and did the cross referencing and wire numbering by hand. ![]() You don’t need a sledgehammer to crack a walnut but you are not going to drive a railroad spike with a nutcracker. On the other hand, if your project only requires a few sheets (B size) and have one or two panel layouts your probably OK with what you have. The report packages bundled with ACE 2008 can do the same checking anytime you click on the little button. When a schematic and panel layout is ‘complete’, it can take several of us a couple of days to check wiring to/from call outs, component location call outs, I/O tables, Bill Of Material line items, etc. Don’t forget all of the multi-pin connectors and multi-conductor cables and of course a pile of terminal blocks all connected to a free standing enclosure with at least one PLC, servo drives, power supplies …. Our machines can have over 1000 sensors, 6 or 7 J-Boxes with remote I/O, multiple vision inspection areas, not to mention a few hundred feet of wire way. The more complex and/or large the projects are the louder I will say yes, it is absolutely worth it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |